Construction unemployment was 3.5% in September, and ABC’s state estimates run from 1.7% in Maryland to 9.5% in North Dakota
State standingsSeptember 2026Not seasonally adjusted
BLS put the national construction unemployment rate at 3.5% in September 2026. ABC’s state estimates, built by Markstein Advisors from BLS data, put every state below 10%, from 1.7% in Maryland to 9.5% in North Dakota.
- U.S. rate, September 2026
- 3.5%BLS household survey
- From September 2025
- −0.3points, from 3.8%
- Lowest state
- 1.7%Maryland
- Highest state
- 9.5%North Dakota
Every state’s estimate sat below 10%, and most fell between 2% and 5%
The unemployment rate for construction workers was 3.5% in September 2026, not seasonally adjusted, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics household survey. That is 0.3 percentage point below September 2025 and 0.4 point above August. On October 30, Associated Builders and Contractors (ABC) published state estimates for the same month, built by Markstein Advisors from BLS data. They put every state below 10%, with Maryland lowest at 1.7% and North Dakota highest at 9.5%.
The national rate
The U.S. rate was 3.5% in September, 0.3 point below a year earlier
In the 25 months charted below, September ties for the fifth-lowest of 24 monthly readings. It sits under the 4.8% average for the last 12 months, an average of 11 readings because October 2025 has no value.
September 2026 came in at 3.5%, below 3.8% in September 2025
Without seasonal adjustment, the rate generally rises in the fall and winter and falls in late spring and summer, ABC’s background note explains, so the September-to-September comparison is the one to read. The 0.4-point rise from August is smaller than last year’s, when the rate went from 3.2% in August 2025 to 3.8% in September.
| Month | Rate, % | From prior month, pts | From a year earlier, pts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2025 | 3.8 | +0.6 | +0.1 |
| Oct 2025 | No value | ||
| Nov 2025 | 4.1 | −0.5 | |
| Dec 2025 | 5.0 | +0.9 | −0.2 |
| Jan 2026 | 7.1 | +2.1 | +0.6 |
| Feb 2026 | 6.9 | −0.2 | −0.3 |
| Mar 2026 | 6.7 | −0.2 | +1.3 |
| Apr 2026 | 3.8 | −2.9 | −1.8 |
| May 2026 | 4.1 | +0.3 | +0.6 |
| Jun 2026 | 4.7 | +0.6 | +1.3 |
| Jul 2026 | 3.7 | −1.0 | +0.3 |
| Aug 2026 | 3.1 | −0.6 | −0.1 |
| Sep 2026 | 3.5 | +0.4 | −0.3 |
What moved
BLS counted 359,000 unemployed construction workers in September, down from 404,000 a year earlier
September 2025
404,000
September 2026
359,000
Unemployed construction workers, not seasonally adjusted. Source: BLS Table A-14.
BLS Table A-14 counts 359,000 unemployed construction workers in September 2026, down from 404,000 a year earlier. A worker is counted as unemployed in construction if construction was the last industry they worked in and they looked for work in the prior four weeks.
ABC’s state numbers are estimates. BLS publishes a monthly construction unemployment rate only for the nation, so Markstein Advisors runs a model on state employment and unemployment data to produce one for each state.
The standings
North Dakota rose 5.6 points from a year earlier, and no other state rose more than 1.7
The low end is mostly the Southeast. After Maryland come North Carolina at 1.8%, Georgia and Tennessee at 2.1%, and South Carolina and Utah at 2.2%. ABC says Maryland’s 1.7% is its lowest September reading on record, and North Carolina and Tennessee had their second-lowest.
The high end is the Upper Midwest, plus Alaska and Massachusetts. North Dakota (9.5%), Alaska (7.5%), Minnesota (6.7%), Michigan (5.8%) and Massachusetts (5.5%) have the five highest estimates. North Dakota is the outlier in the year-over-year column too, up 5.6 points from 3.9% in September 2025. No other state rose more than 1.7 points (Hawaii, where the estimate also counts mining and logging). Alaska’s estimate more than doubled in a month, from 3.2% in August to 7.5%, though it was 6.3% in September 2025, so the year-over-year rise is 1.2 points.
Estimated construction unemployment rate by state, September 2026
Ranked lowest to highestPercent and percentage points, not seasonally adjusted
| State | Division | 05%10% | Sep 2026 | Aug 2026 | Sep 2025 | Chg from Sep 2025 | Sep 2019 | Chg from Sep 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maryland | South Atlantic | 1.7 | 1.7 | 2.1 | −0.4 | 4.7 | −3.0 | |
| North Carolina | South Atlantic | 1.8 | 1.6 | 2.2 | −0.4 | 1.6 | +0.2 | |
| Georgia | South Atlantic | 2.1 | 1.8 | 2.0 | +0.1 | 1.9 | +0.2 | |
| Tennessee | East South Central | 2.1 | 2.0 | 2.4 | −0.3 | 2.3 | −0.2 | |
| South Carolina | South Atlantic | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.7 | −0.5 | 1.5 | +0.7 | |
| Utah | Mountain | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.6 | −0.4 | 1.6 | +0.6 | |
| Florida | South Atlantic | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.4 | −0.1 | 2.2 | +0.1 | |
| New Hampshire | New England | 2.3 | 3.4 | 4.6 | −2.3 | 2.3 | 0.0 | |
| Alabama | East South Central | 2.7 | 2.3 | 2.2 | +0.5 | 3.0 | −0.3 | |
| Idaho | Mountain | 2.7 | 1.9 | 2.7 | 0.0 | 3.1 | −0.4 | |
| Indiana | East North Central | 2.7 | 2.2 | 2.7 | 0.0 | 4.0 | −1.3 | |
| Rhode Island | New England | 2.7 | 3.3 | 4.0 | −1.3 | 7.1 | −4.4 | |
| Iowa | West North Central | 2.9 | 2.5 | 3.0 | −0.1 | 4.3 | −1.4 | |
| Maine | New England | 2.9 | 2.1 | 2.8 | +0.1 | 4.2 | −1.3 | |
| Missouri | West North Central | 3.0 | 2.6 | 3.2 | −0.2 | 2.3 | +0.7 | |
| Ohio | East North Central | 3.0 | 2.1 | 3.7 | −0.7 | 5.5 | −2.5 | |
| Oregon | Pacific | 3.0 | 3.0 | 4.1 | −1.1 | 3.3 | −0.3 | |
| Vermont | New England | 3.1 | 2.3 | 3.5 | −0.4 | 2.7 | +0.4 | |
| California | Pacific | 3.2 | 2.8 | 3.6 | −0.4 | 3.2 | 0.0 | |
| Pennsylvania | Middle Atlantic | 3.3 | 3.6 | 4.4 | −1.1 | 2.7 | +0.6 | |
| Nebraska | West North Central | 3.5 | 2.8 | 4.4 | −0.9 | 2.6 | +0.9 | |
| Colorado | Mountain | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.7 | −0.1 | 1.9 | +1.7 | |
| Nevada | Mountain | 3.6 | 2.2 | 3.9 | −0.3 | 2.7 | +0.9 | |
| Wisconsin | East North Central | 3.6 | 2.1 | 3.0 | +0.6 | 4.0 | −0.4 | |
| Kansas | West North Central | 3.7 | 3.6 | 4.0 | −0.3 | 3.3 | +0.4 | |
| Washington | Pacific | 3.7 | 3.3 | 4.1 | −0.4 | 4.7 | −1.0 | |
| Arkansas | West South Central | 3.8 | 3.2 | 4.3 | −0.5 | 2.7 | +1.1 | |
| Mississippi | East South Central | 3.8 | 2.6 | 4.1 | −0.3 | 4.4 | −0.6 | |
| New Jersey | Middle Atlantic | 3.8 | 3.6 | 5.1 | −1.3 | 2.1 | +1.7 | |
| Kentucky | East South Central | 3.9 | 2.9 | 3.7 | +0.2 | 4.4 | −0.5 | |
| Illinois | East North Central | 4.0 | 3.8 | 4.5 | −0.5 | 2.9 | +1.1 | |
| South Dakota | West North Central | 4.1 | 3.2 | 2.6 | +1.5 | 2.5 | +1.6 | |
| Texas | West South Central | 4.1 | 3.6 | 4.2 | −0.1 | 2.5 | +1.6 | |
| Montana | Mountain | 4.2 | 2.8 | 4.9 | −0.7 | 3.1 | +1.1 | |
| Virginia | South Atlantic | 4.2 | 3.3 | 4.0 | +0.2 | 3.5 | +0.7 | |
| Delaware* | South Atlantic | 4.3 | 3.7 | 4.8 | −0.5 | 2.3 | +2.0 | |
| Louisiana | West South Central | 4.3 | 3.4 | 5.6 | −1.3 | 3.8 | +0.5 | |
| New Mexico | Mountain | 4.3 | 3.8 | 4.3 | 0.0 | 4.2 | +0.1 | |
| Oklahoma | West South Central | 4.3 | 4.1 | 4.2 | +0.1 | 2.2 | +2.1 | |
| Hawaii* | Pacific | 4.4 | 3.3 | 2.7 | +1.7 | 6.1 | −1.7 | |
| Arizona | Mountain | 4.5 | 4.2 | 4.8 | −0.3 | 4.3 | +0.2 | |
| West Virginia | South Atlantic | 4.7 | 4.2 | 4.6 | +0.1 | 5.3 | −0.6 | |
| New York | Middle Atlantic | 4.8 | 4.0 | 5.0 | −0.2 | 4.2 | +0.6 | |
| Connecticut | New England | 5.0 | 3.7 | 4.1 | +0.9 | 2.1 | +2.9 | |
| Wyoming | Mountain | 5.2 | 3.7 | 7.1 | −1.9 | 4.3 | +0.9 | |
| Massachusetts | New England | 5.5 | 4.6 | 5.7 | −0.2 | 3.7 | +1.8 | |
| Michigan | East North Central | 5.8 | 5.2 | 5.8 | 0.0 | 5.4 | +0.4 | |
| Minnesota | West North Central | 6.7 | 5.2 | 5.8 | +0.9 | 4.5 | +2.2 | |
| Alaska | Pacific | 7.5 | 3.2 | 6.3 | +1.2 | 8.8 | −1.3 | |
| North Dakota | West North Central | 9.5 | 7.0 | 3.9 | +5.6 | 4.5 | +5.0 |
The comparison point
32 states were below their September 2025 rate, and 44 rose from August
Counted from ABC’s spreadsheet, 32 states had a lower estimated rate than in September 2025, 14 had a higher one and four were unchanged. The monthly count leans the other way. ABC reports that 44 states rose from August to September, four fell (New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island and South Carolina) and two were flat (Maryland and Oregon).
Against September 2019, 31 states were higher and 17 lower
So the comparison point matters. ABC says 39 states are below their February 2020 rates. Compared with September 2019, the same month before the pandemic, 17 states are lower, 31 are higher and California and New Hampshire are unchanged.
ABC also notes that payroll construction employment, which comes from a separate survey of employers, was 103,000 higher than in September 2025 before seasonal adjustment, and 8.4 million after it. Bernard Markstein, who ran the analysis, pointed to large projects as one cause:
“Data center construction is also absorbing a significant share of available skilled labor and contributing to elevated building materials prices.”
The state tables do not split the unemployed by project type, so that link is his reading of the market.
How to use this number
Read a state’s September rate against its rate a year earlier
The state estimate is a rough measure of how many idle, experienced construction workers are in the labor pool where you hire. Two practical uses:
- Before you price labor-heavy work in another state, look up its September rate and its change from a year ago. A rate near 2%, as in Maryland, the Carolinas, Georgia or Tennessee, means few experienced workers are looking. If you plan to hire locally there, budget for higher wages or for travel and per diem to bring crews in. A rate above 5% with a rising trend points to more local applicants.
- Track your own time to fill field positions, in calendar days from posting to start date, by state. If your time to fill in a state stays flat while its estimated rate fell by a point over the year, your recruiting is holding up against a tighter market. If both move the wrong way, raise your wage assumptions on the next bid there.
For both uses, compare a month with the same month a year earlier.
Revisions and caveats
August was not revised, and the state estimates can change next month
The national rate comes from the Current Population Survey, the monthly household survey that ABC’s background note puts at roughly 60,000 households. The prior month was not revised. August’s 3.1% was the same in the September 4 and October 2 versions of the series in ALFRED, the St. Louis Fed’s archive of past data versions. BLS introduces new population controls each January, and the A-14 table notes that 2025 data use a new industry classification and are not strictly comparable with earlier years. That limits how much weight the 2019 comparisons can carry.
The construction rate also comes from a small subset of the survey, so it has more sampling error than the overall rate. ABC’s background note says a monthly move may come from sampling error and that a sustained trend over several months is more reliable.
The state figures carry two more layers of uncertainty. They are model estimates, and Markstein Advisors updates past months when states revise their employment data, so a state’s August or September value can change next month. Delaware and Hawaii are estimated for construction, mining and logging combined. For a small state such as North Dakota or Alaska, treat a single month’s jump as a reading to confirm against October’s estimate.