Construction employment rose in 177 of 360 metro areas and metro divisions between August 2025 and August 2026, fell in 126 and held flat in 57, according to a ranking the Associated General Contractors of America (AGC) published on September 30. AGC built the ranking from the Bureau of Labor Statistics metro employment data released the same morning. Those figures are preliminary and not seasonally adjusted, so AGC compares August with August. Nationally, BLS counts 8,359,000 construction jobs in August 2026, seasonally adjusted and preliminary. That is 22,000 more than July and 120,000 more than August 2025, a 1.5% gain. It is the highest count in the 25 months shown below and sits about 58,000 above the 12-month average of 8,301,500.

National construction employment reached its highest count in 25 months

All employees, construction, thousands, seasonally adjusted

National construction employment reached its highest count in 25 monthsLine chart with 25 points from August 2024 to August 2026. Series: value. Values range from 8,236 to 8,359.8,2008,2508,3008,3508,4002024-082025-012025-062025-112026-042026-0812-period average 8,302August 2024: 8,236September 2024: 8,254October 2024: 8,262November 2024: 8,267December 2024: 8,276January 2025: 8,264February 2025: 8,267March 2025: 8,273April 2025: 8,271May 2025: 8,269June 2025: 8,267July 2025: 8,261August 2025: 8,239September 2025: 8,255October 2025: 8,243November 2025: 8,279December 2025: 8,272January 2026: 8,317February 2026: 8,296March 2026: 8,311April 2026: 8,314May 2026: 8,316June 2026: 8,319July 2026: 8,337August 2026: 8,3598,359August 2026, 8,359
National construction employment reached its highest count in 25 monthsLine chart with 25 points from August 2024 to August 2026. Series: value. Values range from 8,236 to 8,359.8,2008,2508,3008,3508,4002024-082025-082026-0812-period average 8,302August 2024: 8,236September 2024: 8,254October 2024: 8,262November 2024: 8,267December 2024: 8,276January 2025: 8,264February 2025: 8,267March 2025: 8,273April 2025: 8,271May 2025: 8,269June 2025: 8,267July 2025: 8,261August 2025: 8,239September 2025: 8,255October 2025: 8,243November 2025: 8,279December 2025: 8,272January 2026: 8,317February 2026: 8,296March 2026: 8,311April 2026: 8,314May 2026: 8,316June 2026: 8,319July 2026: 8,337August 2026: 8,3598,359August 20268,359
August 2026 is preliminary. Source: fred.stlouisfed.org
U.S. construction employment, last 13 months
MonthEmployment (000s)MoM change (000s)YoY
Aug 20258,239-220.0%
Sep 20258,255160.0%
Oct 20258,243-12-0.2%
Nov 20258,279360.1%
Dec 20258,272-7-0.1%
Jan 20268,317450.6%
Feb 20268,296-210.3%
Mar 20268,311150.5%
Apr 20268,31430.5%
May 20268,31620.6%
Jun 20268,31930.6%
Jul 20268,337180.9%
Aug 20268,359221.5%
Source: fred.stlouisfed.org

What moved

Just under half of the metros shared in the national gain. Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands added the most construction jobs, 14,100, for a 6% increase to 269,000. Baton Rouge added 13,300 and had the largest percentage gain of any metro, 29%, which took it from 45,800 to 59,100 jobs. St. Louis (11,200 jobs, 14%) and Columbus, Ohio (10,100 jobs, 16%) came next. AGC also lists Davenport-Moline-Rock Island at 14% and Shreveport-Bossier City at 12% among the largest percentage gains, both on much smaller bases.

The largest loss was in the Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell metro division, down 4,900 jobs or 4%. Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario lost 4,600, the Jersey City-White Plains area lost 4,300, and the Oakland-Fremont-Berkeley division lost 4,000. Pittsburgh and the Lakewood-New Brunswick division in New Jersey each lost 3,500, a 6% drop.

Largest over-the-year changes in construction employment, August 2025 to August 2026, not seasonally adjusted
Metro area or divisionBLS seriesAug 2025Aug 2026ChangeChange (%)
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands TXConstruction254,900269,00014,1006%
Baton Rouge LAConstruction45,80059,10013,30029%
St. Louis MO-ILMining, logging and construction81,30092,50011,20014%
Columbus OHMining, logging and construction62,70072,80010,10016%
Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington MN-WIMining, logging and construction101,500108,3006,8007%
Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler AZConstruction178,800185,6006,8004%
Pittsburgh PAConstruction61,80058,300-3,500-6%
Lakewood-New Brunswick NJ (div.)Mining, logging and construction55,80052,300-3,500-6%
Oakland-Fremont-Berkeley CA (div.)Construction72,80068,800-4,000-5%
Jersey City-White Plains NY-NJMining, logging and construction72,10067,800-4,300-6%
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario CAConstruction111,800107,200-4,600-4%
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell GA (div.)Construction109,900105,000-4,900-4%
Source: agc.org

AGC ties the split to project type. Chief economist Ken Simonson said, “Data centers, power projects and advanced manufacturing plants are spurring employment gains in many metros.” He attributed losses elsewhere to tariffs, materials costs and immigration policy discouraging owners. The AGC release does not say which projects drove the gain in any single metro, so the link between a given metro and a given project type is AGC’s general reading.

The BLS release puts some of these numbers in scale. Houston’s total nonfarm payrolls grew by 44,700 over the year, the most of any metro, so construction accounted for roughly 32% of that gain. Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro lost 18,800 nonfarm jobs, and 2,600 of them were construction jobs.

How to use this number

Metro construction employment is the closest public count of the labor pool your crews and subcontractors draw from. Two uses:

  1. Compare your own field headcount change from August 2025 to August 2026 with your metro’s change. If your metro grew 6% and your self-performed headcount is flat, you are hiring against local competitors who have been adding crews all year. If the metro lost jobs and you held headcount, you have gained share of a smaller local workforce, and hiring may come easier than it did a year ago.
  2. Before you price labor-heavy work in a metro you do not usually work in, look up that metro in AGC’s full list. A 29% jump like Baton Rouge’s means contractors there added more than a quarter to their workforce in one year. Build that into your wage assumptions and into the number of subs you expect to bid.

AGC posts the full table alphabetically and by rank, so you can find your metro. Use the year-over-year change, because the metro figures are not seasonally adjusted and a July-to-August change would mix in normal seasonal hiring.

Revisions and caveats

The August metro figures are preliminary. The BLS technical note describes the current month as a preliminary estimate and the month before it as final. BLS also benchmarks all the estimates once a year to a full count of jobs taken from unemployment insurance tax records, and that benchmark can change a metro’s level for past months.

Three details in AGC’s method matter for reading the ranking:

  1. In most metros BLS publishes construction only as part of a combined mining, logging and construction series, because samples are small. AGC counts all of that employment as construction. St. Louis, Columbus and Jersey City are in that group, so part of their totals may be mining or logging jobs.
  2. BLS rounds metro employment to the nearest 100. AGC therefore ranks percentage changes to the nearest whole percent, and many metros tie. Walla Walla, Wash. has the steepest percentage loss at 8%, which is a change of 100 jobs.
  3. The ranking counts metro divisions separately and leaves out the parent metro totals, to avoid double counting. The Atlanta figure covers the Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell division.

BLS tests over-the-year changes for statistical significance at the 90% confidence level only for total nonfarm payrolls in this release. It publishes sampling error for more detailed series such as construction only on request. So a change of a few hundred jobs in a small metro could be within the survey’s normal error (the release lists 373 of 387 metros as essentially unchanged in total nonfarm jobs). The national figure in the chart is seasonally adjusted and comes from a different series, so compare it with the metro figures only on a year-over-year basis.